Clinician’s choices of restorative materials for children in Abha city, Saudi Arabia

Rafi Ahmad Togoo, Zakirulla Meer, Syed Mohammad Yasin, Mohammad S Al-Shaya, Nausheen Saied Khan


Background: It has been observed that at times dentists find it difficult to decide on the technique and materials to use for restoration of deciduous and permanent teeth in children. Aims: To determine the choice of materials and techniques used by dentists for restoration of deciduous and permanent teeth in children. Materials & Methods: Fifty (50) dentists selected at random from the government and private clinics were questioned in Abha the largest city in southern Saudi Arabia using a 10 item questionnaire. Results; A total of 50 dentists were questioned for the study. 24 dentists cited Glass ionomer cement as the most frequently used restorative material in children. 27 dentists chose Silver amalgam and glass ionomer cement as the material of choice for restoration of posterior and anterior teeth respectively. Cavity shape and size for posterior and esthetics for anterior teeth were the major factors for selection of materials. In deciduous teeth Glass Ionomer cement was used by 19 respondents as restorative material for deep caries without pulp exposure and by 23 dentists for restoration of proximal caries. 24 dentists used pit and fissure sealants for restoration of non-cavitated incipient lesions in primary teeth. 29 dentists used Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART) in their day to day practice. Conclusion: The study concluded that G.I.C was the material of choice for restoration of teeth in children followed by composite and amalgam. Atraumatic restoration technique (ART) is practiced by over half of dentists and it encourages patient compliance.



Dentists; Choice; Restoration; Children; Atraumatic Restoration Technique


Saha MK, Saha SG. Restoration of anterior teeth with direct composite veneers in Amelogenesis Imperfecta. International Journal of Dental Clinics. 2011;3(2):99-100.

Gaikwad A. Reinforcing esthetic with fiber post. International Journal of Dental Clinics.2011;3 (2):89-90.

KS R, Vanka A, Shashikiran N. Portland cement: A Building of Evidence for Clinical Use. International Journal of Dental Clinics. 2011;3(1):52-5.

Forss H, Widstrom E. Factors influencing the selection of restorative materials in dental care in Finland. Journal of Dentistry. 1996;24(4):257-62.

Yoonis E, Kukletová M. Tooth-colored dental restorative materials in primary dentition. Scripta Medica. 2009;82(2):108-14.

Mount GJ. An atlas of glass-ionomer cements. A clinician’s guide.3rd edn. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd, 2002

Tran L, Messer LB. Clinicians choices of restorative materials for children. Australian Dental Journal. 2003;48(4):221-32.

Jerrell R, Courts F, Stanley H. A comparison of two calcium hydroxide agents in direct pulp capping of primary teeth. ASDC journal of dentistry for children. 1984;51(1):34-8.

Lo, E. and Holmgren, C. (2001), Provision of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations to Chinese pre-school children – a 30-month evaluation. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 11: 3–10

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Index Copernicus Index Copernicus Google Scholar NISCAIR OpenJGateDOAJUlrichsWeb
System Developed By Stanford University Arizona State University Simon Fraser University Canadian Centre For Studies In Publishing University of British Columbia - Faculty of Education
W3C XHTML v1.0 Verified W3C verified Valid CSS v2.1 PHP5 Enabled CopyScape Protected Made On Mac Apache Enabled MySQL Powered
Published by Celesta Software Pvt Ltd