Online Submissions

Already have a Username/Password for International Journal of Dental Clinics?
Go to Login

Need a Username/Password?
Go to Registration

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.


Author Guidelines

Guide for Authors

Authors wishing to submit their work to the journal are urged to read this detailed guide for authors and comply with all the requirements, particularly those relating to manuscript length and format. This will speed up the reviewing process and reduce the time taken to publish a paper following acceptance.

Online Submission

Submission and peer-review of all papers is now conducted entirely online, increasing efficiency for editors, authors, and reviewers, and enhancing publication speed.

A comprehensive Author Support service is available to answer additional Enquiries at Once a paper has been submitted, all subsequent correspondence between the Editorial Office ( or and the corresponding author will be by e-mail.

Editorial Policy

A paper is accepted for publication on the understanding that it has not been submitted simultaneously to another journal, has been read and approved by all authors, and that the work has not been published before.

The Editors reserve the right to make editorial and literary corrections and content editing.

Any opinions expressed or policies advocated do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the Editors.

Declarations Upon submission

You will be required to complete and upload this form (pdf version or word version) to declare funding, conflict of interest and to indicate whether ethical approval was sought. This information must also be inserted into your manuscript under the acknowledgements section with the headings below.

If you have no declaration to make please insert the following statements into your manuscript:

Funding: None

Competing interests: None declared

Ethical approval: Not required


All authors should have made substantial contributions to all of the following:

(1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data

(2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content

(3) final approval of the version to be submitted.

Normally two, and no more than three, authors should appear on a short communication, technical note or interesting case/lesson learnt.

Full length articles may contain as many authors as appropriate.

Minor contributors and non-contributory clinicians who have allowed their patients to be used in the paper should be acknowledged at the end of the text and before the references.

The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all authors are aware of their obligations.

Before a paper is accepted all the authors of the paper must sign the Confirmation of Authorship form. This form confirms that all the named authors agree to publication if the paper is accepted and that each has had significant input into the paper.

Please download the form and send it to the Editorial Office. (pdf version or word version) It is advisable that to prevent delay this form is submitted early in the editorial process.


All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship as defined above should be listed in an acknowledgments section.

Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help, writing assistance, or a department chair who provided only general support.

Authors should disclose whether they had any writing assistance and identify the entity that paid for this assistance.

Conflict of interest

At the end of the main text, all authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.

Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding.

If an author has no conflict of interest to declare, this should be stated.

Role of the funding source

All sources of funding should be declared as an acknowledgment at the end of the text.

Authors should declare the role of study sponsors, if any, in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. If the study sponsors had no such involvement, the authors should so state.

Ethics Work on human beings that is submitted to the International Journal of Dental Clinics should comply with the principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki (Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, amended by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975, the 35th World Medical Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983, and the 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989).

The manuscript should contain a statement that the work has been approved by the appropriate ethical committees related to the institution(s) in which it was performed and that subjects gave informed consent to the work.

Studies involving experiments with animals must state that their care was in accordance with institution guidelines.

Patients' and volunteers' names, initials, and hospital numbers should not be used.

Language Editing Services Papers will only be accepted when they are written in an acceptable standard of English.

Authors, particularly those whose first language is not English, should use language editing and copy editing services.

Please note, INTJDC neither endorses nor takes responsibility for any products, goods or services offered by outside vendors through our services or in any advertising.

Article Types

The following contributions will be accepted for publication. Please take careful note of the maximum length where applicable. Over length articles will be returned to the authors without peer review:

• editorials (commissioned by the editor)

• clinical papers: no more than 1500-2000 words and10-20 references

  • research papers: no more than 2000-2500 words and 15-20 references

• review papers - no limit on length or number of references (in case of invited reviews) and 1500-2500 words with 15-25 references

• technical notes (surgical techniques, new instruments, technical innovations) - no more than 1000 words, 5-10 references and 4 figures

• case reports - no more than 750-1500 words, 5-10 references and 4 figures

• letters to the editor - please see detailed guidelines provided at the end of the main guide for authors

• Conference announcements

• general announcements. Please note: Case reports will be considered for publication only if they add new information to the existing body of knowledge or present new points of view on known diseases.

Criteria for Publication Papers that will be considered for publication should be:

• based on a sound hypothesis and an adequate investigation method analyzing a statistically relevant series, leading to relevant results that back the conclusion

• well written in simple, scientific English grammar and style

• presented with a clear message and containing new information that is relevant for the readership of the journal

• Note the comment above relating to case reports.

Following peer-review, authors are required to resubmit their revised paper within 3 months; in exceptional circumstances, this timeline may be extended at the editor's discretion.

Presentation of Manuscripts

General points Papers should be submitted in journal style.

Failure to do so will result in the paper being immediately returned to the author and may lead to significant delays in publication.

Spelling may follow British or American usage, but not a mixture of the two.

Papers should be double-spaced with a margin of at least 3 cm all round.

Format Papers should be set out as follows, with each section beginning on a separate page:

• title page

• abstract

• text

• acknowledgments

• references • tables

• captions to illustrations.

Please note that the qualifications of the authors will not be included in the published paper and should not be listed anywhere on the manuscript.

Title page The title page should give the following information:

• title of the article

• full name of each author

• name and address of the department or institution to which the work should be attributed

• name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail address of the author responsible for correspondence and to whom requests for offprints should be sent

• sources of support in the form of grants

• key words. If the title is longer than 40 characters (including spaces), a short title should be supplied for use in the running heads.

  Abstract 200-250 words maximum.

Do not use subheadings or abbreviations; write as a continuous paragraph. Must contain all relevant information, including Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion. Conclusion.

There should be no mention of the institution where the work was carried out, especially in the Materials and Methods section.


• Present first the nature and scope of the problem investigated

• Review briefly the pertinent literature

• State the rationale for the study

• Explain the purpose in writing the paper

• State the method of investigation and the reasons for the choice of a particular method

•; Should be written in the present tense Materials and Methods

• Give the full details, limit references

• Should be written in the past tense

• Include exact technical specifications, quantities and generic names

• Limit the number of subheadings, and use the same in the results section

• Mention statistical method • Do not include results in this section Results

• Do not describe methods

• Present results in the past tense

• Present representations rather than endlessly repetitive data

• Use tables where appropriate, and do not repeat information in the text Discussion

• Discuss - do not recapitulate results

• Point out exceptions and lack of correlations. Do not try to cover up or 'fudge' data

• Show how results agree/contrast with previous work

• Discuss the implications of your findings

• State your conclusions very clearly


Headings enhance readability but should be appropriate to the nature of the paper. They should be kept to a minimum and may be removed by the Editors.

Normally only two categories of headings should be used:

major ones should be typed in capital letters;

minor ones should be typed in lower case (with an initial capital letter) at the left hand margin.

Quantitative analysis:

If any statistical methods are used, the text should state the test or other analytical method applied, basic descriptive statistics, critical value obtained, degrees of freedom, and significance level, e.g. (ANOVA, F=2.34; df=3,46; P<0.001).

If a computer data analysis was involved, the software package should be mentioned. Descriptive statistics may be presented in the form of a table, or included in the text.

Abbreviations, symbols, and nomenclature: Only standardized terms, which have been generally accepted, should be used.

Unfamiliar abbreviations must be defined when first used.

For further details concerning abbreviations, see Baron DN, ed. Units, symbols, and abbreviations. A guide for biological and medical editors and authors, London, Royal Society of Medicine, 1988 (available from The Royal Society of Medicine Services, 1 Wimpole Street, London W1M 8AE, UK). The minus sign should be -. If a special designation for teeth is used, a note should explain the symbols. Scientific names of organisms should be binomials, the generic name only with a capital, and should be italicised in the typescript. Microorganisms should be named according to the latest edition of the Manual of Clinical Microbiology, American Society of Microbiology. Drugs: use only generic (non-proprietary) names in the text.

Suppliers of drugs used may be named in the Acknowledgments section. Do not use 'he', 'his' etc where the sex of the person is unknown; say 'the patient' etc. Avoid inelegant alternatives such as 'he/she'.

Patients should not be automatically designated as 'she', and doctors as 'he'.

References The accuracy of references is the responsibility of the author; please refer to a recent issue of the journal to familiarise yourself with the reference style.

All authors or groups of authors cited in the article must appear in the list of references and vice versa.

References in the text should use (1) numerals with or without the name(s) of the author(s): "Kenneth and Cohen (14) showed?", "it has been shown14 that?" When a cited paper has more than two authors; the citation in the text should appear as "Halsband et al."

The list of references at the end of the paper should be arranged as they appear in the article and numbered, and must contain the name of all authors.

All references cited in the text must be included in the list of references. Clinical and research articles should have a maximum of 15-20 references and case reports no more than 5-10.

Titles of journals should be abbreviated according to Index Medicus (see . When citing papers from monographs and books, give the author, title of chapter, editor of book, title of book, publisher, place and year of publication, first and last page numbers.

Internet pages and online resources may be included within the text and should state as a minimum the author(s), title and full URL. The date of access should be supplied and all URLs should be checked again at proof stage. Examples: Journal article: Halsband ER, Hirshberg YA, Berg LI. Ketamine hydrochloride in outpatient oral surgery. J Oral Surg 1971: 29: 472-476.

When citing a paper which has a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), use the following style:

Toschka H, Feifel H. Aesthetic and functional results of harvesting radial forearm flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001: 30: 45-51. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0005

Book/monograph: Costich ER, White RP. Fundamentals of oral surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1971: 201-220.

Book chapter: Hodge HC, Smith FA. Biological properties of inorganic fluorides. In: Simons JH, ed.: Fluorine chemistry. New York: Academic Press, 1965: 135. Internet resource: International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. External link [Accessibility verified March 21, 2008]


Tables should be used only to clarify important points. Double documentation in the form of tables and figures is not acceptable.

Tables should be numbered consecutively with Arabic numerals. They should be double spaced on separate pages and contain only horizontal rules. Do not submit tables as photographs.

A short descriptive title should appear above each table, with any footnotes suitably identified below.

Care must be taken to ensure that all units are included. Ensure that each table is cited in the text.


All illustrations (e.g. graphs, drawings or photographs) are considered to be figures, and should be numbered in sequence with Arabic numerals. Each figure should have a caption, typed double-spaced on a separate page and numbered correspondingly. The minimum resolution for electronically generated figures is 300 dpi.

Line illustrations:

All line illustrations should present a crisp black image on an even white background (127 x 178 mm (5 x 7 in), or no larger than 203 x 254 mm (8 x 10 in). The size of the lettering should be appropriate, taking into account the necessary size reduction.

Photographs and radiographs:

Photomicrographs should show magnification and details of any staining techniques used. The area(s) of interest must be clearly indicated with arrows or other symbols. Colour images are encouraged.

Figures supplied in colour will appear in colour in the online version of the journal.

Size of photographs: The final size of photographs will be: (a) single column width (53 mm), (b) double column width (110 mm), (c) full page width (170 mm). Photographs should ideally be submitted at the final reproduction size based on the above figures.

Patient confidentiality:

Where illustrations must include recognizable individuals, living or dead, great care must be taken to ensure that consent for publication has been obtained. If identifiable features are not essential to the illustration, please indicate where the illustration can be cropped.

In cases where consent has not been obtained and recognizable features may appear, it will be necessary to retouch the illustration to mask the eyes or otherwise render the individual unrecognizable. Proofs One set of page proofs in PDF format will be sent by e-mail to the corresponding author, which they are requested to correct and return within 48 hours.

INTJDC now sends PDF proofs which can be annotated; for this you will need to download Adobe Reader version 7 available free from External link Instructions on how to annotate PDF files will accompany the proofs.

The exact system requirements are given at the Adobe site: External link If you do not wish to use the PDF annotations function, you may list the corrections (including replies to the Query Form) and return to INTJDC in an e-mail.

Please list your corrections quoting line number. If, for any reason, this is not possible, then mark the corrections and any other comments (including replies to the Query Form) on a printout of your proof and return by fax, or scan the pages and e-mail, or by post.

Please use this proof only for checking the typesetting, editing, completeness and correctness of the text, tables and figures. Significant changes to the article as accepted for publication will only be considered at this stage with permission from the Editor. We will do everything possible to get your article published quickly and accurately.

Therefore, it is important to ensure that all of your corrections are sent back to us in one communication: please check carefully before replying, as inclusion of any subsequent corrections cannot be guaranteed. Proofreading is solely your responsibility.

Note that INTJDC may proceed with the publication of your article if no response is received.


The corresponding author will be provided , at no cost, with a PDF file of the article via e-mail.

The PDF file is a watermarked version of the published article and includes a disclaimer outlining the terms and conditions of use.

Additional paper offprints can be ordered by the authors. An order form with prices will be sent to the corresponding author.

Accepted Articles For the facility to track accepted articles and set email alerts to inform you of when an article's status has changed, visit: External link There are also detailed artwork guidelines, copyright information, frequently asked questions and more. Contact details for questions arising after acceptance of an article, especially those related to proofs, are provided after registration of an article for publication.

Instructions for Letters to the Editor

The INTJDC welcomes Letters to the Editor.

To facilitate submission of the highest quality of Letters to the Editor, the following guidelines should be followed:

1. Letters are meant to be focus pieces and, therefore, are limited to no more than 600 words and 6 references.

One reference should include a reference to the INTJDC article being addressed.

2. It is recommended that you limit your letter to one or two important and critical points to which you wish to provide a clear and precise discussion regarding the previously published article.

3. One should support all assertion by peer review literature which should be a primary research or large clinical studies rather than a case report.

4. Please include any financial disclosures at the end of the letter. This would include the potential conflicts of interest not just related to the specific content of your letter but also the content of the INTJDC article and other related areas.

5. Please recognize that letters that are essentially in agreement with the author's findings and offer no additional insights provide little new information for publication. Likewise, letters that highlight the writer's own research or are otherwise self promotional will receive a low publication priority.

6. There may be a need for additional editing. Should editing be required the letter will be sent back to the author for final approval of the edited version.

7. It is important to use civil and professional discourse. It is not advisable that one adopt a tone that may be misconstrued to be in anyway insulting.

8. Finally, it is not advisable to provide a letter that is anecdotal. While personal experiences can have great value in patient care, it is generally not strong evidence to be placed in a letter to the editor.


Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  1. The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  2. The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
  3. Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  4. The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  5. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
  6. If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.
  7. Check whether all authors Name, Affiliations, Educational Qualifications, Address, Ph, Email, Designation included in the Metadata
  8. All figures uploaded as .tif or .jpg format with a resolution not less than 300 dpi

Copyright Notice

The whole of the literary matter is the copyright of the Editorial Board.

The Journal, however, grants to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, perform and display the work (either in pre-print or post-print format) publicly and to make and distribute derivative works in any digital medium for any reasonable non-commercial purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship and ownership of the rights.

The journal also grants the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal non-commercial use.

The copyright form duly signed by all the authors should be submitted immediately after submitting the manuscript


Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.


Plagiarism is defined by the World Association of Medical Editors as the appropriation of the language, ideas or thoughts of another without crediting their true source and representation of them as one's own original work.

iNTJDC deal with this problem and other cases of scientific misconduct on a case by case basis while following guidance produced by bodies that include the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).

Once any article is detected plagiarism, it will be removed from the journal and a notice will be published in the next issue. Authors will be reseponsible for the consequences of the plagiarism. The editorial team and Publishers will do their best to detect in during the review and editing process. If it happens all authors are equllay responsible for the misconduct and will be barred from publishing further in the Journal for one year.


INTJDC allow readers to reuse and remixing of its content in accordance with a CC BY or CC BY-NC


Index Copernicus Index Copernicus Google Scholar NISCAIR OpenJGateDOAJUlrichsWeb
System Developed By Stanford University Arizona State University Simon Fraser University Canadian Centre For Studies In Publishing University of British Columbia - Faculty of Education
W3C XHTML v1.0 Verified W3C verified Valid CSS v2.1 PHP5 Enabled CopyScape Protected Made On Mac Apache Enabled MySQL Powered
Published by Celesta Software Pvt Ltd